- Despite the Hype, Gilead’s Remdesivir Will Do Nothing to End the Coronavirus Pandemic
- Remdesivir alone is not enough, researchers conclude in first major Covid-19 trial of the drug
- Data Monitoring for the Chinese Clinical Trials of Remdesivir in Treating Patients with COVID-19 During the Pandemic Crisis
- Gilead to end coronavirus drug trials, adding to access worry: researchers
The table below listed the status (fate) of these studies.
Protocol Title
|
Study
Features
|
Fate
of Studies
|
Gilead
Sciences
Phase
III, initially planned for 400 subjects, then increased to 2400, and then 6000
subjects
Two arms: Standard of care + Remdesivir for 5 days, Standard of care + Remdesivir for 10 days
|
Enrolment
was stopped early after 397 subjects were randomized.
Results were published in NEJM (Goldman et
al “Remdesivir
for 5 or 10 Days in Patients with Severe Covid-19“
Conclusion:
“In patients with severe Covid-19 not requiring mechanical ventilation, our
trial did not show a significant difference between a 5-day course and a
10-day course of remdesivir. With no placebo control, however, the magnitude
of benefit cannot be determined.”
It is noted that the study design was flawed and should have included a third arm with Standard of Care without Remdesivir.
The data from this study was further compared to the external control group and results were announced in a recent press release "Comparative Analysis of Phase 3 SIMPLE-Severe Study and Real-World Retrospective Cohort of Patients Diagnosed with Severe COVID-19 Receiving Standard of Care" to show the statistically significant reduction in mortality in Remdesivir group. |
|
Gilead
Sciences
Phase
III, initially planned for 600 subjects, then increased to 1600 subjects
Three
arms: Remdesivir for 5 days, Remdesivir for 10 days, Standard of care
|
The study is active, but not recruiting new patients. The enrolment has stopped. The results have not been published yet.
Gilead announces
results in a press release “Gilead
Announces Results From Phase 3 Trial of Remdesivir in Patients With Moderate
COVID-19”
Also see the articles
|
|
Capital
Medical University/Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Phase
III, 308 Subjects
Two
arms: Remdesivir, placebo
Mainland
China only
|
The study
was suspended (The epidemic of COVID-19 has been controlled well at present, no eligible patients can be recruited).
The results have not been published yet.
|
|
Capital
Medical University
Phase
III, 453 Subjects
Two
arms: Remdesivir, placebo
Mainland
China only
|
The study was terminated after 237 patients were enrolled and randomly (158 in
remdesivir and 79 in placebo) (The epidemic of COVID-19 has been controlled
well in China, no eligible patients can be enrolled at present.)
Results
were published at Lancet
Wang et
al “Remdesivir
in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, multicentre trial”
Conclusion:
“In this study of adult patients admitted to hospital for severe COVID-19,
remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical
benefits. However, the numerical reduction in time to clinical improvement in
those treated earlier requires confirmation in larger studies.”
|
|
National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Phase
II, planned 440 Subjects (protocol specified 394 subjects), actual enrolment:
1063 subjects at the time of DMC review)
Two
arms: Placebo, Remdesivir with additional arms to be added
Multi-National:
US, Japan, South Korea, Singapore
|
The study was stopped after the interim analyses.
Preliminary results
were published in NEJM by Beigel et al. Remdesivir for the
Treatment of Covid-19 - Preliminary Report
Conclusion:
“Remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in
adults hospitalized with Covid-19 and evidence of lower respiratory tract
infection.”
The
results from this study were the basis for FDA to issue Emergency Use
Authorization for Remdesivir. Subsequently, several other countries followed suit.
It is disappointing that the study was stopped after inconclusive or not convincing results from the interim analyses. There was no mention if there was a pre-specified stopping rule and whether the boundaries for stopping the study had been crossed.
The final report was later published in NEJM (on Oct 8). Results were better than those reported in the preliminary report (median recovery time was shorten by 5 days). The final report concluded "Our data show that remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection." |
|
Institut
National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Phase
III, 3100 Subjects
Four
arms: Remdesivir, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Interferon Beta-1A,
Hydroxychloroquine, Standard of care
France
Only
|
This study is funded by WHO and is called DIsCoVeRy in clinicaltrials.gov and SOLIDARITY trial in ISRCTN registration. The interim results were published in a paper "Repurposed antiviral drugs for COVID-19; interim WHO SOLIDARITY trial results". It concludes "These Remdesivir, Hydroxychloroquine, Lopinavir and Interferon regimens appeared to have little or no effect on hospitalized COVID-19, as indicated by overall mortality, initiation of ventilation and duration of hospital stay. The mortality findings contain most of the randomized evidence on Remdesivir and Interferon, and are consistent with meta-analyses of mortality in all major trials." The results were disputed by the manufacturer of Remdesirvir Gilead. |
No comments:
Post a Comment