For diseases with clearly unmet medical needs such as ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis) and Alzheimer's disease, FDA officials have recently emphasized the urgent need for new treatments and pledged to use maximum "regulatory flexibility" when reviewing the NDA/BLA packages. By applying the maximum "regulatory flexibility", FDA has approved some drugs which do not meet the agency's traditional approval standards. Some of the approvals are really controversial and make me wonder if there is any boundary for the maximum "regulatory flexibility".
6 Drugs Approved Despite Failed Trials or Minimal Data
- Ipsen’s Sohonos (palovarotene) for the ultra-rare genetic disease fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive (FOP)
- Sarepta’s Elevidys as the first gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)
- Biogen's Qalsody (tofersen) to treat patients with superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1)-ALS, a rare subtype of the fatal neurodegenerative disease
- Biogen and Eisai got the nod for Aduhelm (aducanumab) for Alzheimer's diease,
- Jazz Pharmaceuticals and PharmaMar’s Zepzelca (lurbinectedin) for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) that had progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy
- Acadia Pharmaceuticals’ Nuplazid (pimavanserin) to treat hallucinations and delusions associated with psychosis in Parkinson’s disease.
No comments:
Post a Comment