Monday, January 07, 2019

Placebo Effect, Honest Placebo, Open-label Placebo

In a previous post, I discussed the Placebo Effect and The Choice of Placebo. When a placebo-control trial failed, we would try to understand if it was because the experimental drug had no significant effect or because the placebo treatment had an effect. There could be multiple reasons for a placebo-controlled trial to fail even though the experimental drug was actually effective.

Recently, I read some articles about the placebo effect and people claimed that placebo did work. 


I believe that the placebo may have some effects, but only in diseases in the CNS and psychological area or in diseases with subjective symptom measures. I also think that the placebo will have an effect only if the patients who receive the placebo treatment do not know which treatment they are receiving (i.e., blinded).

A concept of ‘honest placebo’ blows my mind. The term ‘honest placebo’ is used to describe the open-label placebo – the patient knowingly taking the placebo. When we do placebo-controlled studies, we have always tried to conceal the placebo (through blinding) to avoid the potential biases. In studies with open-label placebo, the blinding is no longer necessary.

The prominent researcher in the area of the placebo effect is Dr. Ted Kaptchuk in Havard University, See Ted Kaptchuk’s TEDMED and his talk Placebo effects make good medicine betterIt seems to be boring if someone spends all of his / her efforts to study the placebo effect. You would think that it will be difficult to get the funding to study the placebo effect. However, Dr. Ted Kaptchuk did receive the NIH grants for studying the placebo effect (for example his NIH grant Enhancing the Placebo Effect in Irritable Bowel Syndrome).


In assessing the placebo effect, the following needs to be considered:
  • Quantifying the percentage of subjects with the placebo effect
  • Don’t expect the placebo effect in diseases beyond certain disease areas (such as CNS, psychological,…). Don’t expect the placebo effect in cancers.
  • Using the objective measure to determine if the placebo effects by subjective measures are real
  • Considering the composition of the placebo treatment. See a previous post Placebo Effect and The Choice of Placebo
  • Considering the treatment compliance (in both the experimental group and the placebo group)
  • Considering the course of the disease (some disease symptoms have a pattern of fluctuation, relapse-remission pattern. 
  • checking if the placebo effect is triggered by the concomitant medications or concurrent treatments (that the researchers may not be aware of).  


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank you for your post on the placebo effect. I would like to add some information and challenge the message that placebo "may have some effects".

The effects of placebo in neurological conditions are well established and sizeable in several conditions. An important aspect you do not mention is the importance of placebo effect in the treatment arm. In what is now a classic study, Kam-Hansen and colleagues (2014) showed that in episodic migraine, for example, the size of the placebo effect is similar in the active treatment and placebo arm of the study.

On cancers, while true that we would not expect an effect of placebo treatment on the biology of disease, placebo effects are very important. And not just for the quality of life of patients with symptoms -not a secondary aspect, in any case. For example dose limiting toxicities (such as nausea, neuropathy) for chemotherapies are subject to placebo (and nocebo) effects, and thus will ultimately affect the effectiveness of chemotherapy in the real world.

For those interested I recommend "Placebo Effects: Understanding the mechanisms in health and disease", by Fabrizio Benedetti. There may be newer stuff out there, but this is really thoughtful and approachable.

Unknown said...

Very interesting insight here. Also, thank you for sharing these links!