For the early clinical phase trials,
especially first-in-man oncology studies, the major objective is usually to
identify a safe dose, such as the MTD (maximal tolerated dose), the
highest dose that can be given with acceptable toxicity, and establish the
safety profile. To identify the MTD, dose escalation studies are usually
conducted. The determination of the MTD is based on the occurrence of the DLT (dose limiting toxicity), Dose-Limiting toxicity is defined to be a
toxicity that prevents further administration of the agent at that dose level. One
of the criteria for FDA to approve a Breakthrough Therapy designation
for an experimental drug is that the experimental drug can significantly improve safety profile compared to available therapy
(e.g., less dose-limiting toxicity for an oncology agent), with evidence of
similar efficacy.
The choice of DLT (dose-limiting toxicity)
may vary from study to study based on the natural history of the disease
and the level of toxicity expected from standard therapy. For example, one
might accept a greater degree of toxicity for a patient with end-stage
cancer who has no other options, but less toxicity for a healthy individual
getting a preventive medicine.
The
DLT has close relationship with the CTC (common
toxicity criteria) and CTCAE
(common terminology criteria for adverse events).
CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) is the
precursor of what is today named the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse
Events (CTCAE). The original CTC was developed by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation
Program (CTEP) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in 1983 to aid in the
documentation and analysis of adverse effects of chemotherapy. CTC, like CTCAE,
included terms and a severity grading scale with descriptions of the allowed
grades of each term. Starting from v3, the CTC was replaced by CTCAE v3.
CTCAE is a list
of terms (adverse events) commonly encountered in oncology interventions. Each
AE term is defined and associated with a rating scale of severity that
indicates the severity of the AE. The rating scale is used in the definition of
protocols parameters (Eligibility; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Dose modification;
etc) and indicates what is reasonable to document, report, and analyze for patient
safety oversight based on current oncology research interventions. CTCAE is
available only in English and the most recent version of CTCAE is verion
4.0. In the new CTCAE v4.0, the AE terms are organized by the System
Organ Classes (SOCs) defined by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
(MedDRA). CTCAE has been developed from the earlier vocabulary known as CTC
(Common Toxicity Criteria).
While CTC /
CTCAE were developed by NCI, they were being used for clinical trials outside cancer
trials such as AIDS/HIV trials, hypertension trials, and others.
The
definition of Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) is determined by the
individual protocol, not the CTC or CTCAE. Although it would be convenient to
assume that all Grade 3 adverse events based on CTC or CTCAE represent dose
limiting toxicities, this may not be appropriate. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (based on CTC
or CTCAE) of complications such as nausea and vomiting can be controlled with
appropriate supportive care measures and may not constitute DLTs. Prolonged
grade 2 toxicities can be considered DLTs depending on the schedule of drug
administration. Acceptable DLTs or adverse events
vary with the patient population and the anticipated outcome of the treatment.
More severe adverse events may be acceptable with a potentially curative
regimen than with a palliative treatment.
Typically in clinical trials, investigators will base their
clinical judgment to grade all reported adverse events (AEs) during the study with
three categories: mild, moderate, and severe.
Mild:
An event that is easily tolerated by the subject, causing minimal discomfort
and not interfering with everyday activities.
Moderate:
An event that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal everyday activities.
Severe: An event that prevents
normal everyday activities.
For oncology trials, the Grading should be based on CTCAE as
following:
Grade 0 No Adverse Event
|
Sign/symptom within
normal limits
|
Grade 1 Mild Adverse
Event
|
Minor
Mild symptoms and intervention not indicated
Non-prescription intervention indicated
No specific medical intervention
Asymptomatic laboratory finding only
Radiographic finding only
Marginal clinical
relevance
|
Grade 2 Moderate Adverse
Event
|
Intervention indicated
Minimal, local, noninvasive intervention (e.g. packing, cautery)
Limiting instrumental ADL
(e.g., shopping; laundry; transportation; ability to conduct finances)
|
Grade 3 Severe Adverse
Event
|
Medically significant but not life-threatening
Inpatient or prolongation of hospitalization indicated
Important medical event that does not result in hospitalization
but may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention either to prevent
hospitalization or to prevent the AE from becoming life-threatening or potentially
resulting in death
Disabling - results in persistent or significant disability or
incapacity
Limiting self care ADL
(e.g., getting in and out of bed; dressing; eating; getting around inside;
bathing; using the toilet)
|
Grade 4 Life-threatening Adverse Event
|
Life-threatening consequences
Urgent intervention indicated
Urgent operative intervention indicated
Patient is at risk of
death at the time of the event if immediate intervention is not undertaken
|
Grade 5 Fatal Adverse Event
|
Death
|
To
map the CTCAE grading to AE severity / intensity, any AE graded as 1 using
CTCAE can be categorized as mild, 2 be categorized as moderate and ≥3 be
categorized as severe.
There
are considerable discussions about the standardization in determining the dose
limiting toxicities.
In
a paper by Paoletti et al “Defining
dose-limiting toxicity for phase 1 trials of molecularly targeted agents:
Results of a DLT-TARGETT international survey”, it was stated “DLT
is traditionally defined as any grade 3–4 non-haematological or grade 4
haematological toxicity at least possibly related to the treatment, occurring
during the first cycle of treatment. Some adjustments to this definition have
been widely accepted, such as febrile neutropenia, or neutropenia grade 4 lasting
more than 7 days or abnormal laboratory values rated as a DLT only in the
presence of clinical symptoms.”
In study by Angevin et al “Phase
I Study of Dovitinib (TKI258), an Oral FGFR, VEGFR, and PDGFR Inhibitor,
in Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma”, the following DLT
criteria were provided in
the study protocol appendix.
4 comments:
In the absence of a grading system available for non-cancer indications, can CTCAE grading be used for clinical trails of non-cancer indications ?
Yes.
you will need to mapping the CTCAE grading to the AE severity though.
how do we define DLT in our clinical practise?
How do you define DLT if there is a combination of treatment? If one of the treatments is already approved with reference information available do you consider the listed expected adverse events not a DLT in general?
For example w cancer vaccine with a-CTLA-4 or cellular therapy with rh IL-2 treatmnet?
Post a Comment