The industry standard for medical coding in clinical trials is to use MedDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory
Activities) for adverse events and medical histories and to use WHO-DD
(World Health Organization – Drug Dictionary) for concomitant medications.
MedDRA hierarchy includes five layers from top to bottom:
-
System Organ Class (SOC)
- High Level Group Term (HLGT)
- High Level Term (HLT)
- Preferred Term (PT)
- Lowest Level Term (LLT)
WHO-DD adopts Anatomical
Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System and the hierarchy
includes five ATC levels from top to bottom:
- ATC Level 1: The anatomical main group
- ATC Level 2: The therapeutic main group
- ATC Level 3: The therapeutic/pharmacological subgroup
- ATC Level 4: The chemical/therapeutic/pharmacological subgroup
- ATC Level 5: The chemical substance
During the coding, verbatim or reported drug names will be
mapped to ATC Level 5 -> ATC Level 4 -> ATC Level 3 -> ATC Level 2
-> ATC Level 1. Summary and statisitcal analyses will typically be based on
ATC level 1 and ATC level 3, but can also be based on ATC level 2 and ATC level
4.
ATC Level is not as obvious as MedDRA hierarchy, however,
both dictionaries use the tree structure. From top to bottom, the choice of
terms expands.
In certain situations, the typical coding based on
these hierarchy levels is not sufficient. Additional grouping may be needed. For
example, if we are specifically interested in any pulmonary hypertension
adverse event, we will need to group any of the following terms together:
Acute right ventricular
failure
|
Chronic right ventricular
failure
|
Cor pulmonale
|
Cor pulmonale acute
|
Cor pulmonale chronic
|
Portopulmonary hypertension
|
Pulmonary arterial
hypertension
|
Pulmonary arterial pressure
abnormal
|
……
|
Pulmonary artery wall
hypertrophy
|
Pulmonary endarterectomy
|
Pulmonary hypertension
|
Pulmonary hypertensive crisis
|
Pulmonary vascular resistance
abnormality
|
Pulmonary vein occlusion
|
Pulmonary vein stenosis
|
Right atrial dilatation
|
…
|
Right ventricular hypertrophy
|
Right ventricular systolic
pressure increased
|
Vascular resistance pulmonary
increased
|
Angiogram pulmonary abnormal
|
……
|
Portal hypertension
|
Pulmonary infarction
|
Pulmonary microemboli
|
Pulmonary vascular disorder
|
Fortunately, both MSSO (the organization for maintaining MedDRA) and UMC (the organization for maintaining WHO-DD) are working on providing these additional
groupings. For MedDRA, the additional groupings are called SMQ which stands for
Standardized MedDRA Queries; for WHO-DD, the additional groupings are called
SDGs which stands for Standardized Drug Groupings.
In a
previous article, I discussed “Adverse
Event of Special Interest (AESI), Standardized MedDRA Query (SMQs), Customer
Queries (CQs), and SAS Programming “.
Standardised MedDRA
Queries (SMQs) are developed to facilitate retrieval of MedDRA-coded data
as a first step in investigating drug safety issues in pharmacovigilance and
clinical development. SMQs are validated, pre-determined sets of MedDRA terms
grouped together after extensive review, testing, analysis, and expert
discussion. SMQs are a unique feature of MedDRA and provide a strong tool to
support safety analysis and reporting. The SMQ topics are intended to address
the important pharmacovigilance topics needed by regulatory and industry users.
SMQs have been developed with the CIOMS Working Group on Standardised MedDRA
Queries that provides pharmacovigilance expertise and validation of SMQs. The
SMQs are maintained with each release of MedDRA dictionary by the MSSO.
SMQs are included in each release of the MedDRA dictionary
with no additional charge.
The Standardized Drug Queries (SDQs) are new additional
classification tools in the WHO Drug Dictionary Enhanced. They have been
developed together with a group of expert dictionary users and cover different
types of classifications e.g. NSAID, cardiac drugs, Old form, CYP etc.
A SDG
is a grouping of medicines having one or several properties in common. The
individual grouping can be based on indication, chemical properties, pharmacodynamic
properties or pharmacokinetic properties as well as any other property of
interest. SDGs can be used in pre-qualification of patients, prohibited
medicines, or safety- and subgroup analysis. Standardized Drug Groupings
simplify creation of protocol violation lists, medications of interest, or other relevant
medication groupings.
SDGs are available per request (not automatically
provided with WHO-DD release) and are free of charge to all users of the WHO
Drug Dictionary EnhancedTM (WHO DDE). The list of currently available
SDGs can be found at SDG product leaflet for drug safety.pdf
There are many presentations describing the use of
SDGs.
-
SDQs – Standardized Drug Queries by Sydow & Singh
- The WHO Drug Dictionary Types, Formats and Loading Considerations in TMS
- Strategies for Coding Oncology Trial Data in Today’s World
- Terminologies for Coding of Adverse Reactions and Drug Development (part 1 of 2)
- Terminologies for Coding of Adverse Reactions and Drug Development (part 2 of 2)
- Terminologies for Coding of Adverse Reactions and Drug Information Hand-outshttp://media.medfarm.uu.se/play/attachmentfile/video/3519/Handouts.pdf
- http://media.medfarm.uu.se/play/attachmentfile/video/3519/Handouts.pdf
-
awesome post presented by you..your writing style is fabulous and keep update on your blogs.
ReplyDeleteMedical coding training in Hyderabad
Thanks for your great and helpful presentation I like your good service.I always appreciate your post.That is very interesting I love reading and I am always searching for informative information like this.
ReplyDeletemedical coding jobs in Dubai
Hello and thanks for the comprehensive explanation of MedDRA terminology. I am new in this matter and I am working on a SAS code for reporting Safety / Adverse Events. I have this specific question, if it makes sense at all ...
ReplyDeleteWhen counting the number of adverse events per treatment arm, for a given term (PT, HLT, HLGT, or SOC), usually that count is equal, or slightly higher than the corresponding number of subjects with that given type of event / term in the arm. If so, for some SMQs, I see certain number of subjects counted (but no / zero event counts)? Assuming my SAS code is correct, at least syntactically, is this even possible?
Thanks! Alex Ginev